Executive Summary
The
purpose of making this report is to provide British Airways (BA) with a
strategic plan for future improvement. In the airline sector British Airways
known to be the UK
market leader, but for the last decade British Airways has been challenged by
other competitors, resulting in wearing down in their market share. The report
in detail analyzes the overall environment of British Airways. This report also
describes the organizational structure and other important aspects of the
organization. In this report through strategic assessment, recommendation has
been given to British Airways to concentrate on their primary qualities like
service delivery in order to re-establish their competitive advantage. There
are two strategies which British Airways will have to implement, one is related
with the HR development strategy and the other is to concentrate on technological
improvement.
In the UK
British Airways Plc (BA) is the biggest international scheduled airline. It
flies to more than three hundreds destinations and carries more than thirty
three million passengers. According to British Airways annual report 2008
approx £8.7 billion of revenue was earned and according to (Data monitor, 2008)
total numbers of employees as of march 2008 stays at 42,377. Along with the
passenger flights British Airways engaged in the operation of domestic and
international carriage of mail and shipment. Regardless of the global economic
downturn, British Airways’ future seems promising. According to latest yearly
report (British Airways, 2008) which stated that British Airways’ objective is
to become world’s most dependable airline.
Strategic
Corporate Development History:
British Airways came into picture
after the merger of the British European Airways and British Overseas Airways
Corporation. After the merger, British Airways had faced numerous problems and
issues such as the cultural difference. British Airways was facing noticeable
problems in cross national operations and acquisitions. According to Lubatkin
& Calori it was the different organizational culture and organizational
culture entrenched in different national culture which was coming together (Very, Lubatkin & Calori, 1996). Problem arose when employees from
different organization, different background and culture had to interact with
each other and when one culture had to adopt the practices of the other culture
(Schneider and DeMeyer, 1991). The main reason
of the problem was the mind-set of employees, different employees would think
in different ways. So, coming on the same page was little difficult for the
employees. Another difficulty or problem faced by British Airways is in terms
of its obligatory management system.
British airways have compliance
with its strict policies and regulation like status difference in an
organization due to various dress codes. Too much rule oriented in the
management is creating problem among staff. Along with those problem
another problem was arose by the new management, they were unable to identify
the proper need and want of the customer. Because company has given
importance on its internal management approach and focus on holding its diverse
routes which resulted on unsatisfied customers.
Effects of Conflicts:
These problems and conflicts between management had
a bad and harmful effect on the new company. British Airways has been
considered as the most disreputable company because of its poor service. In addition, the organization’s operation has been
pretentious and in 1980 the company had been regard to have the worst
timekeeping record all over European carriers flying from UK and named as
the airline to circumvent. This
resulted in the extensive loss for the company.
Management Change at the British
Airways:
After being named as the airline
to avoid, British Airways had to look for some changes within the organization.
As a result they considered vital management changes, called change management.
Some big changes were made by John King who was appointed as the chairman of
British Airways by British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher in 1981. The new
appointed chairman had made some changes like closing many routes, selling off
the freight system and aircraft, along with these actions he also lay off
approximate twenty thousand employees. According to Carlopio change may
be called as the implementation of an innovation, it can be done through an
adaptation of practices in which improvement will be seen in the output (Carlopio, 1998). British Airways has recognized the
need for change in order to gain competitive advantage. Colin Marshall took
charge as the Chief Executive Officer of British Airways in 1982. In this
period British Airways was making its first surplus, but this was happening in
the effect of the changes made by John King in which he tried to cut the cost.
Colin Marshall wants to know
about the staff and what they deliver to the customers, so he hired consultant.
Later Marshall
found out that there is a huge gap between what the employees are delivering
and what the customer actually need. For this reason, Marshall took initiative in changing the
system from staff oriented to customer oriented company through the formation
of “customer is king” policy culture within the British Airways. This approach of satisfying
customer continued until the late 1990s and to keep the employee motivated, Marshall introduced Award
for Excellence in 1987. The main objective of this strategy is to appraise high
performers and motivate employees to efficiently do well in satisfying
customers and fulfil customer’s needs. Another good change made by Marshall for employees
was to work with Lancaster
University to provide MBA
course for British Airways’ employees. Additionally, the organizational
structure of British Airways also changed to a much flatter and smartest
structure. Five sectors of the company are
directly reporting to the CEO and eleven profit hubs were formed. These structural
changes aimed to boost the staff assimilation and communication within British
Airways. Extra pay scheme and appraisal system was also introduced by the
management on the basis of satisfying customers and being consistent at work.
It included key investments in planes, ground facilities and Information
Technology in order to stick to the needs of its customers. All the major
changes were happened after privatization of BA in 1987 and took over British
Caledonian Airways in 1988.
Changes Helped the Organization:
The
main goal of all the changes which are imposed by British Airways is to make
the industry sustain its position in the marketplace and become competitive in
the airline sector. The result of the changes were positive, the company had
become more customer oriented by giving excellent services. All the hard work
and dedication of the management paid off when British Airways was nominated to
receive the “world’s best Airline award in 1989”. It was a prestigious award
for British Airways and it helped the organization to be efficient and
productive. Without HR effective strategies, it is difficult to be strong and
competitive in the market, so in this case Human Resource Management strategies
were the key elements to help the company achieved competitive advantage and
the prestigious award.
Problems Due to Management Change:
Like in any other organization
whenever there is a change in the management; problems and issues arises, same
case with British Airways during and after the management change, it faced different
problems. At one side these changes were able to give British Airways the
position it deserved in the market and on the other hands this management
change was causing some problem. The problem wasn’t related with the employee
performance or its achievement, this problem tends to be associated with the
employee. The problems were recognized was the behaviour of a number of
employees which causes internal problems to the operation of the company.
Response of the British Airways to
Problems:
British Airways was outstanding
in 1999; in that year it faced so many problems and conflicts and used
effective approaches to solve such issues. British Airways introduces
e-commerce strategy to increase online sales. (BA) was also offering flat beds,
laptop, and for business class passenger they offered email, phone and fax
facility to provide full satisfaction to its on board customers. British
Airways focuses on having good employee relationship and customer relationship,
so it brought back its policy of putting “People First”. By doing this they had
satisfied millions of customers and employees as well. This strategy of putting
“People First” had made a great impact on the mind of their customers in a
positive way.
Current Strategic Situation:
Corporate Level Structure:
At a corporate level, BA has a good
quality structure. There is a fresh Acting Customer Director on a provisional
basis, Silla Maizey (British Airways,
2008). She has initiated a fresh
customer service squad working with Heathrow Customer Services, intended to put
client first.
Utilizing the present structure in
order to apply recommended strategy, it is suggested that an enduring director
must be hired. In reference to technological strategy, no adjustments in the
present structure are needed because current system of BA is accordance with
the technological aspects.
Business Level Structure:
At a business level all division
are bound to make such policies which will implement strategy effectively and
efficiently, all the staff should be bound to follow strategic rule
accordingly. Every division should also
adapt the corporate level goals specifically to its own aims. This will assist
to make value for brand, perk up its client relationship and help to accomplish
the settled goals.
Functional Level Structure:
Each function should be harmonized
with each other to achieve organizational objective effectively in a
synchronized manner. All the strategies
and functional objective should be aligned as well it will help each function
to determine whether these functional departments are in lined with the
corporate department. Adequate instruction on the fresh involved technology
will be needed on continue basis to make certain that workers are completely
know to that service.
Organisation and Stakeholder
Power
It is significant to assess the
expectations of diverse stakeholders and the degree to which they are likely to
influence over BA’s strategies. Followings have interest & power on
company;
v
Charity Organizations
v Government/Regulators
v Customers
v Creditors
v Workers
v Rivals
v Suppliers
v Financial Associations
v Shareholders
Stakeholder Map:
INTEREST
|
|||
LOW
|
HIGH
|
||
POWER
|
HIGH
LOW
|
Charity
Organizations
BA give cash to some of listed
aid organizations in
Government/Regulators
Fresh
legislation (if initiated) will have a large impact on the company.
Customers
Customers
give the entire sale but show less curiosity in how the corporation is
administered. But they have a large
impact therefore; the basic objective is to create more customer
satisfaction.
|
Creditors
Should
be kept knowledgeable due to cash yet to be paid though this will not impact
on the options implemented at BA as they have an excellent credit ranking
(Financial Analysis).
Workers
Are the important parts of BA,
likeness workers having the power to satisfy customers. Workers have a vested
awareness as BA gives their financial safety. The personnel’s at BA are
deeply unionised, this add to the power of the workers.
Rivals
BA’s key competitors within their
strategic group have a large interest and power in manipulating BA’s
strategy. The oligopolistic character
of the marketplace will have an effect on the choices BA takes.
Suppliers
Two airline suppliers, Boeing and
Airbus. Both have a high interest and
power upon BA, as BA is a giant source of earnings for both suppliers and BA
also rely upon them for supply. In
short suppliers are more focused toward BA strategies.
Financial Associations
Monetary support perhaps will be
required from Financial associations to finance these strategies and yet
despite the fact that BA has lesser it’s gearing ratio and enlarged its
liquidity. In the present circumstances the associations have large power
over BA and can reject monetary assistance.
Shareholders
Shareholders
have a large interest as to gain financial profits. They have large input in
choosing board members and approving fresh strategies. The shareholders have to be well educated
about the threat of new strategy and expected profitability about the firm.
|
PESTEL Analysis
Internal Analysis:
It is now necessary to examine the
internal environment in order to devise appropriate strategies.
Value Chain
Analysis (VCA):
|
It is considered that corporation
competitive advantage and greater performance is resulted from its
distinguishing capabilities (Johnson et al., 2008 p95).
The resource based view highlight BA’s resources and competencies as below:
RESOURCES
|
COMPETENCIES
|
|
THRESHOLD
CAPABILITIES
|
Threshold
Resources
Tangible
v 245 aircraft flying over 550 different places
(British Airways, 2008).
v Supplementary services (e.g. BA Holidays &
The London Eye Company (Datamonitor, 2008)).
Intangible
v Worldwide Customer Database.
v Joint ventures & coalition with ‘one world’
(incl. American Airlines), code share/franchise partners, and subsidiaries.
|
Threshold Competencies
v Training of ground school, flight simulators, and
cabin security training (BAFT, 2009).
v Economies of Scale from suppliers.
v Capability to fly passengers securely to various
routes and handle passengers (Davies, 2000).
|
CAPABILITIES FOR
COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE
|
Exclusive
Resources
Tangible
v Sole access to London Heathrow Terminal five (BBC
News, 2008).
Intangible
v Highly regarded brand image. BA is familiar worldwide as a
good reputation brand, toughened by its long-standing survival within the
business.
|
Core
Competencies
v Open Skies’ subsidiary’s aircraft never have
above than 64 travellers per flight, with 1 assistant per 12 customers
(British Airways, 2008).
v Initial
|
SWOT Analysis:
It is
significant that strategic formulation is reflective of BA’s strengths and
weaknesses comparative to competitors and the opportunities and threats
presented by its outside environment (Pitts & Lei,
2003).
Internal
Strengths:
v Brand likeness
v Joint ventures & coalitions
v Financial volume and steadiness
Internal Weaknesses:
v Bad
worker relations history
v Dependability
and trust
v Modernization & modification
External Opportunities:
v SkyTrax
Quality structure
v Rivals
forced exit
v Rivals
deteriorating on delivering dependability
v Appearance of new markets
External Threats:
v Open
Skies accord
v Environmental
consciousness
v Worldwide
economic crisis
v Lesser cost competition
Different Aspects of
Proposed Strategies:
PESTEL
|
v Worldwide economic crisis.
v High regulatory requirements.
v Growing environmental consciousness.
v Turn down in consumer expenditures.
v Greater than before utilization of the internet by
consumers.
|
v Centre their attention on technological and environmental
matters.
|
Customer
Analysis
|
v Consumer tendency in far above the ground expediency and
elevated expectations of service.
|
v Make certain changing customer needs should be tackled
and fulfilled
|
Strategic Group Analysis
|
v Strong rivalry within strategic group and tendency for consolidation.
v The major other intimidation comes from low cost
airlines.
|
v Though low cost airlines are the major threat to BA,
stirring into low cost market is not believed suitable based on earlier
unsuccessful attempts.
|
Airline Quality Review
|
v BA = bad baggage managing poor on flight amusement and
low customer contentment.
|
v Service excellence requires to be enhanced to achieve a
competitive advantage
|
The
Value Chain
|
v BA adds value; financial volume and steadiness, brand
likeness, business expertise, and joint ventures and coalitions.
v BA loses value to rivalry; worker relations and
performance, marketing delivery, dependability, and slow modernization.
|
v BA requires addressing the areas where worth is being
missing to avoid offensive rivals’ strategies.
|
Resource
Based View
|
v Tough resources including sole access to hub inside
largest UK Airport.
v Tough training competencies.
|
v Make use of BA core competences to get competitive
advantage.
|
Financial
Analysis
|
v Greater than before profits and lower operational costs.
v Lesser gearing ratios and elevated liquidity.
v Option of a loss in 2009 as a result of the economic
recession.
|
v Investment resources on hand greater than before
inspection on strategic projects for risk evaluation.
|
Strategic Direction for the Future
TOWs Matrix
A range of strategic options will
now be formulated using the TOWs matrix to resolve the strategic issues
highlighted from the analysis.
External
|
||||
Opportunities
|
Threats
|
|||
Skytrax-
star structure of excellence
Rivals
forced exit
Rivals
deteriorating on delivering dependability
Appearance
of new markets
|
Open
skies accord
Environmental
consciousness (Climate change bill)
worldwide
Economic Crisis
lesser
cost rivalry
|
|||
Internal
|
Strengths
|
v Brand likeness
v Joint ventures and
coalition
v Financial volume
& steadiness
v Terminal 5
|
Strategies for strengths to
meet opportunities:
v
Division
focus.
v
Supply
chain migration.
v
Introduction
of admiring services.
v
Present
Broader service
|
Strategies for Strengths to
defend threats:
v
Reformation
of brand likeness.
v
Expand
into other transport markets.
|
Weaknesses
|
v Deprived worker
relations history
v Current negative
attention on dependability & conviction
v Rapid modernization
and modification
|
Strategies for opportunities to
overcome weaknesses:
v Enhanced people
processes.
v Technological improvement
|
Strategies for Weaknesses not
to expose threats:
v Enhanced environmental position
|
Ansoff’s Matrix:
Strategy
Linked to Ansoff
|
Strategic
Options
|
Explanation
|
1. Market Infiltration
|
1.
Enhancement to people processes
|
Decrease
present tension from harmful worker and customer relations.
|
2. Enhanced environmental
position.
|
Go over and beyond the present
environmental needs.
|
|
3. Reformation of brand likeness.
|
Reformation and modernization of
brand likeness in an effort to gain market share.
|
|
4.
Division focus
|
Giving
centre of attention on business class consumers as the most Lucrative segment
of the business.
|
|
2. Product Growth
|
5. Technological improvement.
|
Opening of internet access on
flights to perk up the overall excellence of service.
|
6. Introduction of admiring
services.
|
Presenting of admiring services
such as car rental or hotels.
|
|
3. Market Expansion
|
7. Present broader service
|
Add to number of places BA fly
to, put centre of attention on places of growth
Such as
|
4. Diversification
|
8. Expand into other transport
markets.
|
Broaden your horizons into
substitute services such as rail, in an effort to preserve competitive
advantage.
|
9. Supply Chain integration.
|
Vertical
integration in the supply chain. I.e. Gate Gourmet or Boeing.
|
Strategy No.1:
People Processes
Aim: Enhanced
stakeholder brand likeness & productivity
Objectives:
- v Make use of databases.
- v Perk up service delivery effectiveness.
- v Develop internal communication.
- v Put into practice efficient review monitoring.
Performance Measures:
- v Income margin add up to of 2 – 3%.
- v Amplified repeat purchasing by 25%.
- v Enlarged consumer recommendation from 58% (2007/08) to 69%.
- v Improve worker survey rate from 34% (2007/08) to 79%
Strategy No.2:
Technological Advancement:
Aim:
Customer Loyalty & Market Share
Objectives:
- v Following progression with test internet execution, roll out internet and on-board internet facility.
- v A suitable pricing strategy involving admiring service for first class whilst targeting business class as the main lucrative market.
- v Constant market research to make certain that this is an appreciated service and seek chances for further growth
v Put
in equipment on 244 aircraft which were left.
v Amplify
business class market share by 11%.
v 79%
of business class consumers buying internet usage.
v Pursuing
R&D put into practice 1 new technological service.
Future of British Airways:
The corporation is
still in front of great problems in spite of its plans and modification
imposed. In this case, the Gate Gourmet increases up in the cause of the
troubles in terms of the BA’s brand likeness. Such argument has shaped up a
concept that the business practices imposed by British Airways is not pertinent
to what it demonstrate in its company images. With this, the
administration is now trying to look for some strategies and methods to resolve
these troubles with different strategy and along with these marketing communications
will be utilized as well. In addition, the present
administration also understands that the lack of leadership and entrepreneurial
capability have been the root cause of all the troubles faced by the
corporation.
Recommendations:
It appears that the main reason
of the troubles faced by British Airways is due to the unplanned management
transformation imposed. Additionally, the troubles also occurred because of the
insufficient awareness about the strategic management system and along with the
other administrative system. Strategic management is
the course of identifying an organisation’s intentions, creating policies and
plans to attain these intentions, and assigning resources, so as to execute the
plans. It gives overall track to pursue to the whole enterprise (Abell, 1999). It can be
"sighted as a set of theories, frameworks intended to give details of the
issues underlying the performance of corporation and to help managers in
viewing, planning and acting tactically" (Campbell,
Evans & Stonehouse, 2002).
Conclusion:
As
the main objective of this assignment was to study Longitudinal Strategic Development of company for that reason one of the
best airline of UK has been selected, as per requirement different analysis has
been made with reference of the British Airways which includes Strategic Corporate Development History,
Current Strategic Situation and Proposed Strategic Direction for the Future.
Different methods were used to analyse and review British Airways current
strategic situation for instance SWOT Analysis, Resource Based View (RBV),
Value Chain Analysis (VCA), PESTEL Analysis, and Stakeholder Map.
For Proposing Strategic
Direction for the future, TOWs matrix to resolve the strategic issues
highlighted from the analysis. As an outcome of the external and internal
examining a number of strategic options were given. It was stated that a
collective strategy method to perk up service quality was considered most
appropriate. Due to the present business climate the most appropriate strategy
is to consolidate BA’s status as market leader. Due to lack of primary
research and limited access to corporation information there might be some
lacking in findings and proposed strategies, if the general direction of
recommended strategic intent will lead BA to victory.
References:
Grugulis, I and
Wilkinson (2002) ‘Managing Culture at British Airways: Hype, Hope and Reality’,
Long Range Planning, 35: 2.
Strategic management in
the aviation industry (2005), By Werner, Herbert, Stephen and Sasha; Ash Gate Publishing
ltd.
Strategic management:
awareness and change (1993), Second edition by John L. Thompson; Chapman and
Hall.
Strategic management:
concept (2008), Ninth edition by Fred R David; Prentice Hall.
Airlines to the
low-cost carrier threat’, Journal of
Air Transport Management, 13: 5, 311-321
Chan, D (2000) ‘The
Development of the Airline Industry from 1978 to 1998: A Strategic Global
Overview’, Journal of Management
Development, 19: 6, 489-514.
Gittell, JH (2003) The Southwest Airlines Way : Using the Power
of Relationships to Achieve High Performance, McGraw-Hill , New York .
Grugulis, I and
Wilkinson, A (2002, April) ‘Managing Culture at British Airways: Hype, Hope and
Reality’, Long Range Planning,
35: 2, 179-194.
Higgins, RB (1996) The search for corporate strategic
credibility: Concepts and cases in global strategy communications,
Quorum Books, Westport , CT.
Strategic Management
(2003), Second edition by Philip saddler; Biddles Ltd.
Strategic Management:
Competiveness and globalization, Eight edition by Hitt , Ireland
and Kisson; South western Publishing.
Kumar, K and
Subramanian, R (2000) ‘Navigating the External Environment through a Market
Orientation’, SAM Advanced Management
Journal, 65: 1, 16-30.
Miles, SJ and Mangold,
WG (2005, November-December) ‘Positioning Southwest Airlines through employee
branding’, Business Horizons,
48: 6, 535-545.
Oliveira, AVM (2008)
‘An empirical model of low-cost carrier entry’, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 42: 4,
673-695.
Porter, ME (1980) Competitive Strategy, The Free Press,
New York .
Porter, ME (1985) Competitive Advantage: Creating and
Sustaining Superior Performance, The
Free Press, New York .
Southwest Airlines
(2008) ‘About Southwest’, Southwest
Airlines website, http://www.southwest.com/about_swa/
Sunoo, BP (1995, June),
How fun flies at Southwest Airlines’, Personnel
Journal, 74: 6, 62-71.
Vlaar, P, De Vries, P,
and Willenborg, M (2005, April), Why Incumbents Struggle to Extract Value from
New Strategic Options: Case of the European Airline Industry, European Management Journal, 23: 2,
and 154-169.
Vowles, (2001, July),
The “Southwest Effect” in multi-airport regions, Journal of Air Transport Management, 7: 4, 251-258.
Web Reference:
No comments:
Post a Comment